“What is the oldest reference to the shape of the Italian peninsula resembling a boot?”*

*Image: map of Italy with Puglia highlighted.

*From Reddit.com:

“Responses:

trillskill

The earliest mention I was able to find was in “THESAURUS GEOGRAPHICUS. A NEW Body of Geography: Or, A Compleat DESCRIPTION OF THE EARTH:” dated 1695.

The passage reads:

“The Figure or Shape of this Country is very Remarkable, and may be well compar’d to that of a Man’s Leg, the End whereof seems as it were to kick the Island of Siciliy into the Sea ; the Toes appear toward the Faro, or Watch-Tower of Messina, round Reggio, and the Cape of Spartivento ; the Heel toward Ancona ; the Ham about Ravenna; the Knee toward Piembino, and the Port of Leghorn ; and the Thigh toward the Alps.

Italy is stretched forth toward the South, as it were a Peninsule, in form of a Boot, into the Mediterranean-Sea…”

BaffledPlato

I believe that Italy was not compared to a boot until boots began to look like Italy. What I mean is footwear in the ancient world like the caligae did not typically have such prominent heels, so this shape would not remind anyone of a boot. Pliny in Natural History (III, Of Italy) instead compares the shape of Italy to an oak leaf:

I may premise by observing that this land very much resembles in shape an oak leaf, being much longer than it is broad…

mmmmmmBacon12345

Is there a different oak leaf he may be referencing? Italy is shaped nothing like the oak leaf you find in New England

BastouXII

You already have very good answers to your precise question, but I’d like to mention that for someone to refer to the Italian peninsula as a boot, you need two things :

1 An accurate enough map that shows the peninsula the way we know it today;

2 A civilization that has boots shaped like that.

You could probably find dates and regions for both premises needed and start looking for boot shaped Italy in documents of that era.

I’m no expert in either, but I know maps weren’t really accurate before the 13th or 14th century (when the Portolan chart started to emerge) and it only improved slowly from there until maybe the 16th or 17th century before we had maps close to what we know today (in terms of precision). For the boots, it seems to vary a lot by region and era, as others mentioned already in this thread.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s